SnapCor - Reporting Reinvented

SnapCor - Reporting Reinvented

How SnapCor Reduces Reporting Time by 70% for Electrical Thermography

Ask any electrical thermographer where their time goes and you’ll hear the same story:

  • The inspection itself is efficient.
  • The reporting is not.

You finish a long day in front of MCCs, distribution boards and UPS panels… then spend hours more:

  • Downloading thermal images from the camera
  • Matching them to assets in Excel
  • Manually applying load correction and severity
  • Typing fault descriptions and remedial actions
  • Formatting everything into a PDF the client will actually read

SnapCor was built to attack that bottleneck directly. By combining automation, embedded formulas and on-device report generation, SnapCor can reduce electrical thermography reporting time by 70% or more – without compromising on technical quality or compliance.

This article breaks down how.


Where Electrical Thermography Reporting Time Is Really Wasted

Before we talk about SnapCor, it’s worth mapping the typical “old-school” workflow.

1. After the survey: data chaos

  • Dozens or hundreds of thermal images on the camera
  • Visual images in a different folder
  • Asset lists and notes in Excel, paper, or memory
  • Load and ambient readings scattered in notebooks or voice memos

Just organising everything into a usable structure can take hours.

2. Manual calculations and grading

For each anomaly, the engineer has to:

  • Look up measured temperatures and load
  • Apply load correction and temperature rise formulas
  • Decide if it’s a minor, serious or critical issue
  • Cross-check against internal standards or BS 7671 expectations

It’s slow, error-prone and hard to keep consistent across a team.

3. Writing the report

Then comes the “word processor shuffle”:

  • Pasting images and tables into Word
  • Manually building summary tables by board, location or severity
  • Writing root cause, risk and remedial actions from scratch for each fault
  • Reformatting until the document looks professional enough to send

For a large site, it’s easy to spend 4–6 hours on reporting alone.

SnapCor’s design philosophy is simple: everything that can be automated, should be.

SnapCor’s design philosophy is simple: everything that can be automated, should be.

Snapcor classifies every fault using formula driven severity logic,
no more manual ranking or inconsistencies.

The Three Pillars: Speed, Automation, Accuracy

SnapCor delivers its time savings by focusing on three core areas.

1. Speed: On-Site Report Generation

SnapCor runs on Android phones and tablets and is built around on-site reporting:

  • You capture images and data directly against each asset in the app.
  • As you work, SnapCor builds fault pages and summary tables in the background.
  • At the end of the inspection, you tap “Generate Report” and get a fully formatted PDF in under a minute (even for dozens of images).

No more “I’ll send the report in a few days.” The report leaves the site when you do.

2. Automation: Embedded Logic Instead of Spreadsheets

SnapCor uses the proven TICOR engine under the hood, which means:

  • Automatic load correction for electrical faults
  • Automatic severity grading (Minor / Important / Serious / Critical)
  • Pre-configured templates for LV/HV panels, MCCs, switchboards, UPS, busbars, etc.
  • Drop-down root cause and remedial libraries, instead of typing from scratch

You still capture the same technical data – but SnapCor does the maths and grading for you.

3. Accuracy: Consistency Across Engineers and Sites

Because the logic is standardised:

  • The same inputs always produce the same severity band.
  • Fault wording can be standardised across a whole team.
  • Reports are aligned with your internal rules and industry expectations, not whatever each engineer remembers on the day.

This doesn’t just save time; it raises the overall quality and defensibility of your reporting.


Inside the SnapCor Workflow (Electrical Thermography)

Let’s walk through a typical electrical survey and see where the time savings appear.

Step 1 – Prepare the Inspection

Before you arrive on site, you (or a planner):

  1. Import or create the asset list (boards, feeders, key loads).
  2. Choose the electrical thermography template.
  3. Sync the job to the SnapCor device.

Time saved vs old-school: No manual re-entry of asset names or locations after the visit.


Step 2 – Capture Thermal & Visual Images

On site:

  1. Select the board or asset from the preloaded list.
  2. Capture a thermal image from your camera and attach it.
  3. Capture or attach a visual image for context.

 

SnapCor links everything to the correct asset instantly.

Time saved vs old-school: No renaming files or matching “IMG_1034.jpg” to “LV Board 5 – Feeder 4” back at the office.


Step 3 – Record Measurements Once

For any anomaly you find:

  • Enter measured temperatures (hot spot & reference).
  • Enter load (current/percentage) and ambient temperature.
  • Add any quick notes.

SnapCor then:

  • Calculates temperature rise / delta T.
  • Applies load correction if needed.
  • Assigns a severity rating.

You see a complete fault page taking shape as you stand in front of the panel.

Time saved vs old-school: No manual calculator work or spreadsheet entry later. You never type the same numbers twice.


Step 4 – Let SnapCor Handle the Narrative

For each fault, you select options from SnapCor’s knowledge-based library:

  • Anomaly type: loose termination, overload, phase imbalance, neutral overheating, etc.
  • Suspected root cause: poor termination, design issue, contamination, component degradation.
  • Remedial action: re-make terminations, balance phases, uprate cable/breaker, further investigation, etc.

These are pre-written, professional phrases – you just choose and tweak.

Time saved vs old-school: No more “blank page” problem when writing: “Terminations to be checked, cleaned and re-made to prescribed standard…” for the 50th time this week.


Step 5 – Instant PDF Report On-Site

Once the inspection is complete:

  1. Tap Generate Report.
  2. SnapCor compiles:
  3. Export or email the PDF directly from the device (or sync when back online).

For a typical site, this step takes seconds, not hours.


What Does “70% Time Reduction” Look Like in Practice?

Let’s put some realistic numbers around it.

Old-School Example

  • 150 images (say, 80 panels with multiple anomalies)
  • 1 working day on site to capture everything
  • 4–6 hours in the office to:

Total reporting time: 4–6 hours (often billed as half a day or more).

With SnapCor

  • 1 working day on site (same as before)
  • Reporting happens as you inspect:

End of the day: tap “Generate Report”, wait under a minute, export PDF.

Total additional reporting time: 30–60 minutes (mainly for final review and client-specific tweaks).

That’s a 70%+ reduction in reporting time – and on some repeat jobs, it can be even more.


For Teams: Multiplied Savings and Consistency

For a single thermographer, saving 3–4 hours per large job is already attractive. For a team, it compounds quickly:

  • More jobs completed per week, same headcount
  • Easier to train new staff to produce high-quality reports
  • Managers get consistent, comparable reports across all engineers and sites
  • Less overtime and admin fatigue

SnapCor also integrates with a central platform so larger organisations can:

  • Trend temperature and severity over time
  • Prioritise remedial work by criticality and site
  • Demonstrate performance and risk reduction to stakeholders.

Accuracy: Why Faster Doesn’t Mean Sloppier

A natural concern: “If the software is so fast, are we losing quality?”

In practice, SnapCor improves accuracy:

  • Formulas and thresholds are embedded, not rekeyed from memory.
  • Severity grading is consistent and defensible.
  • Every fault page is structured the same way, reducing the chance of missing key data.
  • The thermographer sees the report structure as they go, making it easier to spot anomalies or missing information in real time.

Fast doesn’t mean rushed; it means automated where it should be, human where it matters.

SnapCor makes life easier for a thermographer.

Best Practices to Get the Full 70% Reduction

To unlock the biggest time savings:

  1. Standardise templates Agree on one electrical thermography report style across your organisation.
  2. Train the team on the in-field workflow The more you capture correctly on-site, the less you touch back at the desk.
  3. Use the knowledge-based library Encourage engineers to use standard root cause and remedial phrases as a baseline and customise only when needed.
  4. Review on-site with the client Use SnapCor’s fault pages to walk the client through critical issues before you leave, so there are fewer follow-up edits.
  5. Sync regularly to the central platform Keep your trend data clean and up to date – it will make future surveys and planning even faster.

 


Ready to Make Reporting the Fastest Part of the Job?

Electrical thermography doesn’t have to mean long evenings wrestling with spreadsheets and Word documents.

With SnapCor, you can:

  • Capture inspections as you always have
  • Let the software handle calculations, grading and formatting
  • Generate professional, client-ready PDFs on-site
  • Cut reporting time by around 70% – while improving consistency and technical quality

 

SnapCor’s subscription model launches on 1 January, with support for Android mobiles and tablets, so your thermography team can adopt this workflow without changing cameras or hardware.

If you’re ready to turn reporting from a bottleneck into a competitive advantage, SnapCor is built to do exactly that.

Ready to Make Reporting the Fastest Part of the Job?
SnapCor Delivers it.

Book A demo today
Back to blog